Re: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) is needed by hashcash-1.09-1
Justin Guyett <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2004-09-29T01:54:22+0000, Paul Laudanski wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I went to a couple glibc locations on the web and the most current is 2.3.3. I > can't locate 2.3.4. I went back 4 pages in this newsgroup via gmane and didn't > find a related topic title. > > The sites: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/libc.html > http://tinyurl.com/7x8q3 > > Help is appreciated. CVS. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-11/ http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-12/ (Read the "versioning" thread from November 29th.) The thread starts here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-11/msg00150.html Most distros are using CVS glibc, and were even doing so before last December. All that message means is that you need to recompile hashcash. There may be other reasons to upgrade glibc, but getting something like hashcash to run is not one of them. -- The old must give way to the new, falsehood must become exposed by truth, and truth, though fought, always in the end prevails. -- L. Ron Hubbard