Re: Double Spend Protection

Steve Crook <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:39:31 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.spam.hashcash
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:21:14PM -0500, Adam Back wrote:
> Is this the same problem as the procmail problem?
> 
> If so I think the patch will fix, I'll try integrate and make a new
> release this weekend.
> 
> Or is this with that patch applied?

Adam,
This is with that patch applied.  Hashcash now returns a non-zero code
when the token is invalid, but double-spending is not checked.