Re: stamp speeds on new hardware
Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:32:40 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> That is one core on the athlon64 so a single athlon64 x2 with both >> cores slightly outperforms the 2Ghz G5. > > Remind me to re-run this on my G5 using a version compiled with > GCC4, if possible. I've found with other programs that GCC4 makes > a huge difference to the G5, though much less on G3/G4. My G5 > (thanks IBM) has two 2.3GHz CPUs, so should easily beat the A64 again. I just completed a 40-bit test using old 1.08 binaries. A 40-bit stamp was successfully minted in under 7.5 hours (about half of expected), using both CPUs of my 2.3GHz G5. hashcash token: 1:40:051222:[email protected]::Cu2iqc4SmotZ7MRR:0000214c3J Now who said Macs were slow? -------------------------------------------------------------- from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton mail: [email protected] website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/ tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B) - not displayed