Re: stamp speeds on new hardware
bas <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:49:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
http://www.digitalproducer.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=32951-1 Jonathan Morton wrote: >>> That is one core on the athlon64 so a single athlon64 x2 with both >>> cores slightly outperforms the 2Ghz G5. >> >> >> Remind me to re-run this on my G5 using a version compiled with GCC4, >> if possible. I've found with other programs that GCC4 makes a huge >> difference to the G5, though much less on G3/G4. My G5 (thanks IBM) >> has two 2.3GHz CPUs, so should easily beat the A64 again. > > > I just completed a 40-bit test using old 1.08 binaries. A 40-bit stamp > was successfully minted in under 7.5 hours (about half of expected), > using both CPUs of my 2.3GHz G5. > > hashcash token: 1:40:051222:[email protected]::Cu2iqc4SmotZ7MRR:0000214c3J > > Now who said Macs were slow? > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton > mail: [email protected] > website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/ > tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it. > >