Re: stamp speeds on new hardware

bas <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:49:56 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.hashcash
Message-ID <[email protected]>
http://www.digitalproducer.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=32951-1

Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>> That is one core on the athlon64 so a single athlon64 x2 with both
>>> cores slightly outperforms the 2Ghz G5.
>>
>>
>> Remind me to re-run this on my G5 using a version compiled with  GCC4, 
>> if possible.  I've found with other programs that GCC4 makes  a huge 
>> difference to the G5, though much less on G3/G4.  My G5  (thanks IBM) 
>> has two 2.3GHz CPUs, so should easily beat the A64 again.
> 
> 
> I just completed a 40-bit test using old 1.08 binaries.  A 40-bit  stamp 
> was successfully minted in under 7.5 hours (about half of  expected), 
> using both CPUs of my 2.3GHz G5.
> 
> hashcash token: 1:40:051222:[email protected]::Cu2iqc4SmotZ7MRR:0000214c3J
> 
> Now who said Macs were slow?
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> from:     Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
> mail:     [email protected]
> website:  http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/
> tagline:  The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.
> 
>