Re: Research: "95% of email is junk"
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:36:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John Honan wrote: > Link: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/5219554.stm > > Some statistics from a report by 'email security firm' Return Path; > > - 95% of all email is junk (spam, viruses, error messages) > - Less than 4% is legitimate traffic > - 99% of the computers they 'monitor' have been taken over by spammers > - Only 1% of net addresses could be regarded as legitimate sources of > mail. The rest are hijacked computers, or bots, used by spammers to send > e-mail > > Another company 'Ironport' claims that 80% of email comes from > compromised hosts. you know, percentage numbers are pretty much useless without a reference enabling you to turn it into real numbers. For example, 80 percent of e-mail coming from compromised hosts means what? How much e-mail over what period? good Lord, this is the very statistic we need to get a handle on the zombie problem with respect proof of work puzzles. (just being a pain in the ass today which is not much different from yesterday or tomorrow) ---eric