Re: PR Problem?
"Todd A. Jacobs" <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:56:43 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:15:14PM -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > mailing lists. New users get stamps for the first message (or two) > then they are white listed and they never get stamps from that point > on. I'm not sure I see the logic of this behavior. My point was that a mailing list that provided stamps for outgoing messages (not requiring them for posting)--or better yet passing on MUA-minted stamps--might be a good way to prevent listmail from getting caught up in someone's filters. If you are filtering based on the existence of hashcash headers, you do *not* want to stop receiving hashcash headers unless your filtering pipeline is smart enough to handle whitelists. Maybe yours does, but I think it would be unwise to assume that's the default behavior for most MDA pipelines. If bogofilter (to pick one example) learns that hashcash headers are a good indication of ham, a sudden lack of hashcash headers would tend to make the mails look like spam. Q.E.D. -- Unabashedly littering the information superhighway with detritus like this for over 15 years now.