Re: PR Problem?
decoder <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:41:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.hashcash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:16:40AM +0100, decoder wrote: > >> Currently we stamp all outgoing mails on our postfix server (just >> some Bcc: stuff does not work), and we check hashcash stamps with >> spamassassin. > > If you're doing it at the MTA, why doesn't BCC work? As someone else explained as well, we didn't want to fork a new mail for each Bcc: receiver. And putting the stamp into the header would disclose the recipiens so we decided to let out Bcc: for a while... > And what are you using to generate the stamps in postfix? I wrote my own content-filter script to do all the stamping in perl. > >> Works fine though we almost never receive any stamped mails.... > > And if you did, what exactly would you do with it? What action > would you take (or not take) if you received stamped mail? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFWC/BJQIKXnJyDxURAmWlAJ0ajpUpsFMNb045nOjNLtxfJ+xg+gCgoZsu Mln4G/K8gtMITSRRdbDgtac= =SpQF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----