Re: Question about reporting

"Paul Goodyear" <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:13:20 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.razor.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I have been reporting pretty much every one of these image spams, but after
reading this, do you think it might be better to not report these at all?

If Razor is never going to be able to detect these as spam (in the near
future) then filling the database with 100's of these a day aint going to
help.

Should I stop submitting these single images spams?

Thanks.

Paul.

On 10/27/06, Matt Kettler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> John Andersen wrote:
> > On Friday 27 October 2006 09:57, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> >>> Dears,
> >>>
> >>> some time ago (in nov. 2004, I guess) I registered with Razor2 a
> server
> >>> of mines in order to report spam.
> >>>
> >>> I could easily see that whatever piece of spam I was reporting, was
> soon
> >>> reported as spam by a further check on the very same message.
> >>>
> >>> Recently, I see that my reportings are basicly ignored.
> >>>
> >>> I there any policy change in this matter, or is due to some
> >>> misconfiguration on my side?
> >
> >> Are the spams you're doing this with some of the current image spams?
> >
> > He said "the very same message", and I took him at his word.
>
> As did I. I took it to mean the EXACT SAME message. ie: run it through
> razor-report, then later run the exact same file through razor-check.
>
> My explanation of the one-offs is not to suggest he's using two different
> messages in his test, it is to explain why nobody else will ever report
> the same
> one. That's why it's not being listed.
>
> Giampaolo is not being ignored, there's just no other reports of the same
> signature.
>
> And regardless, even if his one report did cause listing, it would not
> matter.
> Nobody, not even Giampaolo, will ever get that same image again.
>
>
> > This is not to say that one-off custom messages (be it text or image) do
> > not present a challenge for razor.  However other engines such as
> > spamassassin usually do properly catch these things.
>
> My spamassassin catches about 80-90% of these. I'd also point out I'm much
> more
> proficient in SA than most folks are. (I wrote antidrug.cf, and the
> original
> WritingRules guide that's in the SA wiki)
>
> >  Even the random text messages.  (The theory of bayes poisoning has been
> pretty well
> >> de-bunked).
>
>
> Well, yes, bayes poisoning has been debunked, and I am personally one of
> the
> people who has done a lot of public education to debunk it, and explain
> why it
> can't work in a chi-squared system.
>
> But this isn't poisoning, at least not in the true sense. Poisoning is
> where you
> mix nonspam content with your spam. These messages aren't a mix. In this
> case,
> there's NO spam in the text section of the message. All the spam parts are
> in
> the image.
>
> Because of that A bayes filter won't detect these messages very well.
>
> Looking at my most recent 13 image based stock spams, every single one
> scored
> BAYES_50. All were tagged as spam by SA (obviously not due to bayes), and
> 7 of
> them were autolearned as spam.
>
> But despite all the autolearning, the bayes scores aren't going up. Why?
> Because
> the text in one looks nothing like the text in the other. Learning them
> does
> almost nothing for your bayes system. It's statistically irrelevant to
> detecting
> other similar spams. Fortunately, it's irrelevant to just about
> everything, so
> this won't hurt your bayes DB either.
>
> The bayes system did very little here. It consistently gets fed lots of
> these
> messages, but can't pick them up as more than BAYES_50. They're all tagged
> based
> on RBLs and SARE gif rules, not bayes or razor.
>
> I would not rely on bayes any more than razor to detect these. Both are of
> limited use against this particular variant.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users