[Bug 8335] New: Remove Pay-for-Play DNSBL Rules Backed by For-Profit Vendor

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]/SpamAssassin/>
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8335

            Bug ID: 8335
           Summary: Remove Pay-for-Play DNSBL Rules Backed by For-Profit
                    Vendor
           Product: Spamassassin
           Version: 4.0.2
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Rules
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]
  Target Milestone: Undefined

The following rules should be removed from SpamAssassin, as they lend undue
credibility to a for-profit, pay-for-play company masquerading as a trusted,
open reputation authority:

- RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED
- RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED
- RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL
- RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED

These rules are based on data from Validity, a private company that acquired
SenderScore and now sells deliverability services. One such service is Sender
Certification (https://www.validity.com/sender-certification/), where senders
can pay to improve their deliverability. This creates a clear conflict of
interest when integrated into an open-source spam filtering tool.

It’s especially concerning that this line
(https://github.com/apache/spamassassin/blob/234b4b0c34067549525f77276ca6e09c899a42d7/rules/20_dnsbl_tests.cf#L152)
in the SpamAssassin ruleset includes a direct link to a sales page for
Validity, reinforcing the perception that SpamAssassin is endorsing their
business model.

Including these rules in an open-source project effectively supports a
pay-for-play ecosystem under the guise of objective scoring. It misleads users
into trusting a proprietary and profit-driven system as if it were a neutral
third-party source.

SpamAssassin should not promote or integrate DNS-based scoring mechanisms from
companies whose core business depends on payment for reputation. Doing so
compromises the integrity of the project and the trust the open-source
community places in it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.