Re: [Bug 8346] Bayestest extremely slow since 4.0.2
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/5/25 9:00 PM, Patrik Schindler wrote: > Hello, > > may I kindly ask somebody to explain why SA does now do CNAME lookups in DNS, and what the expected benefit thereof is, compared to the former behavior? Thanks! > spammers use to frequently create new cnames pointing to the same malware/phishing web page in order to bypass antispam softwares. > Aside from that, a local caching DNS (same machine, outside spamd) might somewhat counter the perceived slowness? Maybe allowing a lot more SA children might also help. They use RAM but virtually no CPU, because they're waiting for DNS answers. > a fast dns is usually enough to limit perceived slowness in many situations. Giovanni > Thanks! > > :wq! PoC >
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEqg3TnG6R3qYMxl94+r7qCYlyWOUFAmi9ZCcFAwAAAAAACgkQ+r7qCYlyWOVZ 4Q//TBA6KdWJUXUoS7ZKnQy0x/fuKkTCBwZbD1fMHcIFoGC6YikQKx+SHwA8WujAAYFEX69BCrUt 8sT+twKgnpp4ZK4Tv1uATqneYa8AU+k9Y224CvPNrjjT64dOCpkaCzEpKdl/ba2QGrQntg7lyBYJ sANOCvCXGDUA8VJuComROrMueOJY+jWBoEp1osfUK6jv48hLY+NC0Ug0agUZS9UWfXCgBNKddL1Q 5Ifc7kErv3SMATU7WawYegV7QFdnVTlV8vWk73ny2XOx9Kfw3OxSndutyrUYU8saNg1gFx+zUScq llHg07ZoF0cHOPExy3P46Qm1asAU1SEoAv6tRvyjtjb8lXk6MrVXm2aI3n5lk6H8WtYqkvfB10n4 OxddVnNcwlGrg/YTASCSW0mx3AVqqLCQajflPzhxEzyiiHHBVw5t1dp6BsJR+tvo1Dz/MPpD7ZOl uNpDU9x0p6iUhfGMJSbC+v7CLBJtKD7crpIm6NVqfFqCOhSfNmJvZj+gG//5+r70Kd0Qz8l+rTic crYZqcdeV/vRp+ciaUBlUa8GfIrS9nTgIXlhDFqzm/jJmVZulUZPLJelSZgp+OxXtAwmL5XKOK5H xOLNY586Y3581GsTUDnsDXGnVP3mzsMo1yHDobO2SIh7ytdCnosFwsL5jGxUllkUZNK7PrXM+aRA PgY= =Gvd1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----