Re: Lots of FN because of VALIDITY* rules
postgarage Graz IT <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/5/24 11:14, postgarage Graz IT wrote: > > > On 6/5/24 09:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On 2024-06-03 at 08:35:32 UTC-0400 (Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:35:32 +0200) >>> postgarage Graz IT <[email protected]> >>> is rumored to have said: >>>> I think that the active.list file should be updated, when there are >>>> new rules, shouldn't it? >> >> On 03.06.24 08:52, Bill Cole wrote: >>> It is updated where it is actually used, on the ASF rule maintenance >>> system. It is irrelevant to an operational deployment. >>> >>> I have no idea why Debian installs that file at all. >> >> It does not, I guess that the OP did because of misunderstanding of >> what it does. > > No I didn't. Please have a look at > https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/all/spamassassin/filelist where you > can clearly see, that it is included in Debian's SA package. > >> >> I can only guess that the rules were not fresh enough or OP installed >> obsolete/invalid rules there. > > The first thing I did was to check if the updates worked (they did) > neither did I install any rules myself. OK, after having a second look, I take that claim back. It might be that I ran sa-update by manually myself (which works) but maybe does not run automatically. > >>