Re: Where are your test definitions?

On 14.06.24 16:39, Thomas Barth via users wrote:
>I would like to explain a sender what he can do to create an email 
>that is not classified as spam.
>
>X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.248 tagged_above=1 required=5
> tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, 
>DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
> DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.001, FONT_INVIS_MSGID=2.497,
> FONT_INVIS_NORDNS=1.544, HTML_FONT_TINY_NORDNS=1.514, 
>HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
> RDNS_NONE=0.793, RELAYCOUNTRY_BAD=2, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, 
>SPF_PASS=-0.001,
> T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01]

FONT_INVIS_NORDNS=1.544
HTML_FONT_TINY_NORDNS=1.514
RDNS_NONE=0.793

working fcrdns would fix much for them.

However, not doing stupid shit with fonts would help even more:
FONT_INVIS_MSGID=2.497
FONT_INVIS_NORDNS=1.544
HTML_FONT_TINY_NORDNS=1.514

Without seeing what matched that it's hard to guess more


>I cannot find the definitions on your old site 
>https://spamassassin.apache.org/old/tests_3_1_x.html.

why 3.1?

>FONT_INVIS_NORDNS, FONT_INVIS_MSGID, HTML_FONT_TINY_NORDNS, RDNS_NONE
>
>Is there no current version of the test definition.



-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Remember half the people you know are below average.