Re: Need some help decoding an SA analysis
Benny Pedersen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | junc.eu |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Anders Gustafsson skrev den 2024-06-16 13:42: > This one: > > Return-path: <xxxxxxx> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on xxxxxx > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.6 required=5.0 > tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, > MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RDNS_NONE, > TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX,TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS_HTML,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, > URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST > autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5 > Received: from hosted-by.csrdp.host ([195.10.205.97]) > by xxxxx with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Sun, 16 Jun 2024 11:52:11 +0300 > Reply-To: Email Mailbox Notification xxxxxx #9698 <xxxx> > > It was a phishing email and the provider has since shut it down. Now we > do not have that adress in our > whitelist. Should I interpret this that some of the entries we do have > in our whitelist uses this adress or > provider? time to upgrade https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/195.10.205.97.html remove localy whitelist change score for whitelist to non default -100 phishing links goes to phishtank.com train bayes on phishing emails