Re: ChatGPT > Spamassassin? :)
Mark London <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bill - Thanks for the response. As an aside, it would be nice (though impossible?) for a spam filter to be more suspicious of emails coming from a new email address, that is not in my Sent folder or my Inbox. FWIW. - Mark On 6/25/2024 11:21 AM, Bill Cole wrote: > Mark London <[email protected]> > is rumored to have said: > >> I received a spam email with the text below, that wasn't caught by >> Spamassasin (at least mine). The text actually looks like something >> that was generated using ChatGPT. In any event, I put the text >> through ChatGPT, and asked if it looked like spam. At the bottom of >> this email , is it's analysis. I've not been fully reading this >> group. Has there been any work to allow Spamassassin to use AI? > > "Artificial intelligence" does not exist. It is a misnomer. > > Large language models like ChatGPT have a provenance problem. There's > no way to know why exactly the model "says" anything. In a single > paragraph, ChatGPT is capable of making completely and directly > inconsistent assertions. The only way to explain that is that despite > appearances, a request to answer the ham/spasm question generates text > with no semantic connection to the original, but which seems like an > explanation. > > SpamAssassin's code and rules all come from ASF committers, and the > scores are determined by examining the scan results from contributors > and optimizing them to a threshold of 5.0. Every scan of a message > results in a list of hits against documented rules. The results can be > analyzed and understood. > > We know that ChatGPT and other LLMs that are publicly available have > been trained on data to which they had no license. There is no way to > remove any particular ingested data. There's no way to know where any > particular LLM will have problems and no way to fix those problems. > This all puts them outside of the boundaries we have as an ASF > project. However, we do have a plugin architecture, so it is possible > for 3rd parties to create a plugin for LLM integration. > >