Re: whitelist_auth return_path / from

"Simon Wilson via users" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general
Message-ID <1037bf-66855800-f-759a9800@88044385>
Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 14:56:

> Do I also need to disable the normal SA DKIM plugin evaluation, i.e.
> trusting my upstream authres_trusted_authserv only?

both works in paralel, so no need to disable, best results came from 
both enabled

its up to you to add more authres_trusted_authserv or more 
authres_ignored_authserv lines

possible we can now have a very long debate on dmarc plugin ? :)

my question is does spamassassin dmarc plugin use authres results ?
 
- SA's DKIM plugin has failed a message so USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST tag will not get assigned, and a +0.1 is added for a DKIM fail
- with AuthRes plugin installed, my trusted Authentication-Results header ‘DKIM pass’ = -0.5 is applied
- yes, the -0.5 overrides the +0.1 from the false DKIM fail, but this does not overcome the reason I wanted the sender in whitelist_auth - to overcome the FP of their emails triggering a KAM rule
 
Ideally what I want is for authres.cf to combine:
 
header AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS eval:check_authres_result('dkim', 'pass')
with 
header USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST   eval:check_for_dkim_whitelist_from()
 
and generate -100 that the DKIM plugin assigns to a DKIM pass/USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST entry.
 
…but I don't know how to do that properly. I can combine into a meta rule, but that will call the existing DKIM plugin's subroutine to evaulate USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST, and I'm not sure if that will work.
 
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.