Re: whitelist_auth return_path / from

Benny Pedersen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general
Organization junc.eu
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 15:54:

> header AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS eval:check_authres_result('dkim', 'pass')
> header USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST   eval:check_for_dkim_whitelist_from()

keep scores of them neutral

meta MY_DKIM_FAILS_NOTRUST (AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS && USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST)
describe MY_DKIM_FAILS_NOTRUST Meta: AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS && 
USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
score MY_DKIM_FAILS_NOTRUST -1 -1 -1 -1

i say no trust since authres can be fooled by untrusted AR headers, when 
authres_networks all is in use

> and generate -100 that the DKIM plugin assigns to a DKIM
> pass/USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST entry.

why ? are you sure -100 is a very good idea ?

> …but I don't know how to do that properly. I can combine into a meta
> rule, but that will call the existing DKIM plugin's subroutine to
> evaulate USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST, and I'm not sure if that will work.

need more info on your mta setup, if postfix then i need postconf -nf 
and postconf -Mf in private mail, as i see you can  :)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.