Re: CC: address matches To: address
"Peter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hard call, as some are going over due to other rules. I often start with a high score so that I can see a rule is working, then reduce it if I see a need. I would just be happy to have a rule that worked. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 14/07/2024 at 11:07 AM John Hardin wrote: >On Sun, 14 Jul 2024, Peter wrote: > >> It's pretty straightforward. >> >> From: "-Pittsburgh Tool Set-"<[email protected]> >> In-Reply-To: >> <bwtiwirqpsxb5j6oemipfa1q8byaf5sicb7l6rovz@dfxd.rtr.nganads.online> >> To: [email protected] >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" >> CC: [email protected] >> Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 18:58:43 +0000 > >Pretty much what I thought, just wanted to be sure. I'll add something to >the sandbox and we'll see how it does. > >For the spams that had this sign, how close to scoring "spammy" (5 points) >were they? > > >-- > John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ > [email protected] pgpk -a [email protected] > key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > 2 days until the 79th anniversary of the dawn of the Atomic Age