Re: DATE_IN_FUTURE_24_48 more often?

>> > > I think I am starting to see this more often. Today I was checking
>> > > again every server to see if the ntp time is syncing properly. But
>> > > don't notice anything weird, can't really believe this sending had a
>> > > bad clock. Can anyone suggest what/where to look for?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > DATE_IN_FUTURE_24_48 Date: is 24 to 48 hours after
>> >
>> > When you  looked at the Date: header, what did it say?   The part of
>> > your question where you gave an example didn't make it through the
>> > mailinglist!
>>
>> I was wondering if I am the only one seeing this. Could also be related
>> to my transitioning to el9. I can remember having to change some scripts
>> for time/timezone. Logged times seem ok:
>>
>> mta logging was on this date: Jul  4 08:51:37
>> message header Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 08:51:35 +0200
>> message header Received: xxxx  Thu, 4 Jul 2024 08:51:37 +0200

On 22.07.24 09:58, Marc wrote:
>This does not look like something out of the ordinary not? Even if it is a timezone/summertime issue it is still not 'is 24 to 48 hours after'

This looks correctly.
I remember seeing this issue when users put incorrect date or incorrect 
timezone.

Do those still appear?
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759