Re: Tips on training bayes?

On 18.09.24 13:42, Grega via users wrote:
>Right now in SA 4.0.1 bayes at least for me is really challenging to train and set up.
>
>I had good trained DB from past V3 install, and it behaved really odd.
>
>I trained it on new set of mails 3000 spam and 3000 ham (HAND PICKED mail it was PAIN) and I cant get either BAYES_00 or BAYES_99 :)
>
>I mean I get them occasionally, but not even close to what it was in V3.
>
>
>In V3 SA bayes was decisive, when well trained it was awesome.
>
>Nov in V4.0.1 bayes is NON decisive, and in 90% of cases it gives me BAYES_40 or _50 even after I mark those mails as SPAM OR HAM.
>
>
>What is even more weird is, that some mails aren`t even bayes scored at all. BAYES_XX is missing from headers entirely and I
>
>don`t know why...
>
>
>I`m kind of sorry that I upgraded to 4.0.1...


looking at your first mail, it seems that you only have tokens for a few 
days:

dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 1190, nham = 12441 dbg: bayes: DB expiry: tokens in \
DB: 979401, Expiry max size: 1500000, Oldest atime: 1725361640, Newest atime: \
1725888528, Last expire: 0, Current time: 1725888537

% date -d @1725361640
Tue Sep  3 13:07:20 CEST 2024

% date -d @1725888528
Mon Sep  9 15:28:48 CEST 2024


How do you call spamassassin, directly, via spamass-milter, amavis or other 
way?
Did you tune any bayes settings?
Do you have your trusted_networks and internal_networks set up properly?

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod