Re: Whitelist or BAYES?
Kris Deugau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Vianet Internet Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
joe a wrote: > Maybe I should not ask this, but . . . > > A relatively innocuous member informational email from a local town Library (monthly) gets marked as spam as shown below. > The BAYES_99 and BAYES_999 values are something I am toying with for other reasons. Seems odd these should hit either one of those tests. > > So, on the one hand I can add them to whitelist and be done with it, or I can add > them to missed HAM for re-learning. > > Which is the best approach? Both. Feeding it to Bayes helps to correct its behaviour for both future messages from this sender and similar mail from others, and welcomelist_from_(whatever) ensures that future mail from this sender doesn't get caught. I still use welcomelist_from_rcvd now and then for senders that are (still) variously fumbling - or outright skipping - SPF and DKIM. :/ -kgd