Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email.

Nix <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 20 Nov 2024, Andy Smith uttered the following:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:07:09PM +0000, Nix wrote:
>> > From https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS :
>> 
>> Tried registering here. I can register a v4 address, but every format of
>> v6 CIDR I've tried reports "Invalid V6_CIDR" with (of course) no
>
> I experienced the same a couple of months ago and reported it to them.
> Their response after several weeks was:
>
>     "I investigated this with our engineering team. We currently don't
>     support IPV6 in the on the my validity/ zone file registration page.
>     Our product team is working to remove IPV6 as option.
>
>     Currently only IPV4 single and IPV4 range are supported. I apologize
>     for any confusion."
>
> I see they haven't got around to removing the IPv6 features that they
> consider a mistake yet then.
>
> (They don't have IPv6 addresses on their nameservers so currently there
> is no point supplying your IPv6 netblocks in any case. You're not
> missing out.)

Oh right. I never even considered *checking* that. Of course they've got
IPv6 addresses, who hasn't who's running a server for high-volume public
use?

... most of the more stick-in-the-mud corners of the Internet, it turns
out.

> More here:
>
>     https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg23456.html

Wow, that thread is eye-opening. Fairly hilarious DNS management, I must
say...

> Their web site only half works. They were unable / unwilling to explain
> to me how they have calculated that I have exceeded their limits when
> I'm almost certain that I haven't. I find their corporate web site to be
> difficult to understand regarding what they actually do or sell. But
> their DNS lists *are* free so there is a limit to what one can expect. I
> don't have a lot of confidence that they will continue to exist as a
> company.

Indeed not.

> I don't think they should be in default SpamAssassin and if I experience
> any more problems with them then I'm going to disable lookups.

Ditto.

-- 
NULL && (void)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.