Re: moderately personalized spam sneaking past my SA. general approaches to fix it?
pgnd <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 12:42:58PM -0500, pgnd wrote: >> , sneaking past my SA protections. Whether to call it snowshoe, I dunno :-/ But my usually well fed Bayes isn't getting noticeably better with 'em. >> https://gist.github.com/pgnd/5ab934d921939f4c62a4c978a30b9e6f > > Are you even running bayes? Headers do not mention any BAYES_* matches (not even the undecisive BAYES_50) ? > Is something shortcircuiting Bayes, or is it perhaps not running for some other reason? Good catch. Yes, I am, in general. And on most if not all the machines where these are sneaking through. Although ... In this example it's off(... 'usually' ...) while I'm figuring out just what the non-Bayes rules are doing. I use bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::Redis and figured it wise to get that out of the loop. I did see my entries being written during learning, but wasn't seeing significant scoring as a result for these leak-thrus. I'll put it back eventually. I'm focused atm on using available rules -- out-of-the-box and KAM. IF the answer is that the only way to cope with this is WITH Bayes, then that's a learning too.