Re: Google url redirect ?

Pierluigi Frullani <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general
Message-ID <CAAYce_=M2VioC2H-8o9UmsWLU1k=YtVP6Yrad9VgGMKacFVhxg@mail.gmail.com>
Here's the output ( the relevant part I think ):

X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.2 required=4.4 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,
        HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES,
        PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,URI_NOVOWEL shortcircuit=no
        autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Report:
        *  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
        *      provider
        *      [mauneypals[at]gmail.com]
        *  2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
        *      [URI: haligr.click (click)]
        *  0.5 URI_NOVOWEL URI: URI hostname has long non-vowel sequence
        *  1.0 HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES URI: Completely unnecessary %-escapes
        *      inside a URL
        *  0.7 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
        *      identical to background
        *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
        *  0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image

FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,URI_NOVOWEL
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.713,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES=1,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999,T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,URI_NOVOWEL=0.5

I can trap those because of the HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES which I can give a
bit more aggressive score, but no "GOOG*" in report.
Obvioulsy I think it could be dangerous to give a greater score
to FREEMAIL_FROM as it could lead to false positive when receiving valid
mails from gmail, or I'm wrong ?
Could it be I'm missing something in config ?

For info I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.4.6   running on Perl version
5.22.2 just sa-updated few minutes ago.

I'm preparing the zip file woth some  the
Do you want me to send the zip file ( I have 46 mails that have failed ) ?

Pierluigi


Il giorno mer 25 dic 2024 alle ore 18:42 John Hardin <[email protected]>
ha scritto:

> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024, Pierluigi Frullani wrote:
>
> > Hi all, I know it's not really a new subject but I would like to ask how
> > can I stop url redirect from google.*.
> > These days I'm receiveind a lot of messages that are really spam, but
> they
> > pass trough spamassasin, containing the following:
> > "url?q=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2F"  from several google location ( I mean,
> > images.google.com, google.es and so on.
> >
> > Is there any good rule to catch them ( at least to score some value to
> this
> > messages ) ?
>
> There are existing google redirect rules. It's possible they may not be
> hitting the variants you are seeing.
>
> If you run the message through SpamAssassin with these flags:
>
>     --debug area=rules,rules-all
>
> you will get information about which rules and subrules hit. You can use
> that to make a meta rule that works better on such messages.
>
> Feel free ot zip up spamples and send them to me directly for review, if
> we're missing new variants or some Google domains that would help us
> improve our coverage.
>
>
> --
>   John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
>   [email protected]                         pgpk -a [email protected]
>   key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    "Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never
>    does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here."
>                                             -- Peter da Silva in a.s.r
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Today: Christmas
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.