Re: Request for Whitelisting or Spam Score Adjustment for our TDL Domain

On 16/02/2025 01:07, Bill Cole wrote:

> On 2025-02-15 at 07:42:44 UTC-0500 (Sat, 15 Feb 2025 13:42:44 +0100)
> wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn <[email protected]>
> is rumored to have said:
> 
>> Hi Bill,
>> 
>> so do you have another idea?
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> No, I do not, aside from the implicit starting point: do not send spam. 
> Make sure every recipient is an individual who has asked for your email 
> and wants it, to the greatest degree possible. If you cannot do that, 
> nothing anyone can tell you will fix your deliverability. SpamAssassin 
> is not designed to allow "legitimate" bulk unsolicited email. Users who 
> want that should whitelist the spammers of whom they approve and avoid 
> showing it to SA.
> 
> Relevant to avoiding having your email seen as spam by SpamAssassin, 
> sending less spam-like email and finding a new and better domain name 
> are the full extent of my deliverability advice. I understand that 
> these recommendations are not easily implemented for an established 
> organization.

errrr. the problem is the dynamic style address block, not spam. PBL is 
a list that is essentially a DUL.

Benny (for once) gave the *only* sensible answer, get an IP that is 
static and not in a PBL (DUL/Dynamic style) address pool and get proper 
A/AAAA and matching PTR records.

--

Regards,
Noel Butler