Re: Ways to reduce calls to Validity BLs (was Validity (return path blocklist))
"Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Apr 8, 2025, at 9:39 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It IS part of the business model, which is why in more than 20 years we have never charged for queries or xfers, and we never will. Even though senders pay us, we consider the receivers to be our customers, and our first responsibility is, and has always been, to them. After all, isn't the whole purpose of a DNS cert list, and indeed Spam Assassin, to help keep email usable and to better identify good email versus spam so that receivers have to do a little bit less heavy lifting, and can focus their resources on actual spam? >> That is the *entire* reason for our being > > with the new limits your beeing has no longer any reason We are not Validity, we are the other guys, we have no limits, never have, never will. We are represented in the rules by "IADB". Anne -- Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. Email Law & Policy Attorney, Legislative Advisor Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law) CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Creator of the term 'deliverability'; Co-Founder of the deliverability industry Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Dean Emeritus, Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School Prof. Emeritus, Lincoln Law School Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Counsel Emeritus, eMail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)