Re: Cold emails are not considered spam?
Bill Cole <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2025-05-09 at 13:21:41 UTC-0400 (Fri, 9 May 2025 13:21:41 -0400) Karl Denninger <[email protected]> is rumored to have said: > Bayes seems to get them most of the time, if you train it well. As more and more of this is AI-generated the "catch" rate goes up incidentally, as AI is, well, certainly artificial but not very intelligent :-) It is also worth noting that Bayesian spam filtering is conceptually related to what LLM "AI" tools do. They assemble texts word-by-word based on the likelihood of each one being next based on the preceding series of $bignum words. They write artificial banality that is ideal for Bayesian analysis. -- Bill Cole [email protected] or [email protected] (AKA @[email protected] and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Not Currently Available For Hire
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 256 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIoEAREKADIWIQSD6xgpiXWgu9hXilLazUImdqvDjAUCaB6aORQcYmlsbGNvbGVA YXBhY2hlLm9yZwAKCRDazUImdqvDjEtNAQCLFTOQsBrFI14OHZNY+6qxeleoaHEZ 9LWxyKIyl7ZnDQD+I/VRDLc8JlcVXD94tYm23Q5GMwyCNjoShj0QTVvMz/Y= =NfiF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----