Re: rep.mailspike.net

Bill Cole <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Please keep replies on the list...


On 2025-05-21 at 14:16:09 UTC-0400 (Wed, 21 May 2025 18:16:09 +0000)
Rupert Gallagher <[email protected]>
is rumored to have said:

>> rep.mailspike.net is not even supposed to be a nameserver. I don't see why you think it should have an A record
>
> NXDOMAIN is the legitimate DNS answer for a non existent domain.

Unless your resolver is broken, there's no NXDOMAIN for rep.mailspike.net, but rather a NOERROR:

	$ dig rep.mailspike.net

	; <<>> DiG 9.20.6 <<>> rep.mailspike.net
	;; global options: +cmd
	;; Got answer:
	;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 16558
	;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

	;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
	; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
	;; QUESTION SECTION:
	;rep.mailspike.net.		IN	A

	;; Query time: 343 msec
	;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) (UDP)
	;; WHEN: Wed May 21 19:21:21 UTC 2025
	;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 46


NOERROR with zero answer means that there's some record for rep.mailspike.net, just no A record.

> The problem with some DNSxLs is that they respond NXDOMAIN when the query is negative / they have no information on a given IP.

That's the correct reply if they have no entry for the IP. I don't see how it is a "problem."

> This makes it impossible to tell whether they are out of service, because they return NXDOMAIN on the server itself.

There's a RFC defining operational flags and other DNSBL best practices. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6471#section-3.3 for specifics.

I do not know of ANY DNSBLs that have an A record for the root domain of the list. It would serve no purpose in most cases.


-- 
Bill Cole
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.