Re: Score for KAM_LIST3_1

"Alan via users" <[email protected]> writes:

> I got a FP on this rule, which isn't really that bad, save for the
> default score of 5.75. That's enough to get a spam classification on
> it's own.
>
> I've adjusted the score locally but the default seems a tad heavy. I'm
> giving it a 3.25.

Many others have the same sorts of feelings.  I've said before that no
rule should have a score approaching 5 unless it is pretty much
inconceivable that it would hit on ham.  I scored down a bunch, and
decided that the risk to ham was too great, and deconfigured the KAM
ruleset.

It was great at bringing the score of a lot of spam above my reject
threshold, and keeping a bunch of the rest out of my inbox.  A lot of
tough calls and you need to decide what you want to do.