Re: Performance degradation in 4.0.2?
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/3/25 9:04 AM, Tobi wrote: > Hello list > > since beginning of this week we use the new spamassassin 4.0.2 Since > then we can see that processing time (at least for particular mails) > massively increased. We use a timeout of 30s in our setup to > communicate with SA. > > Two mails we now have that cannot be processed anymore in that time and > therefore get stuck in our processing. > > Mail A has a huge load of links/mailtos in header and body. About 7k. > The timing in processing with the very same rules is from 6s (in 4.0.1) > to 2.5min (in 4.0.2). I counted the number of URI spamassassin detected > and the number of DNS queries in both versions and they are more or > less equal. So I guess the increase in processing time is not DNS > related. > > Mail B does not have that many URI but a quite complex HTML attachment > with a load of styles with almost every div and span tag. The > processing time is 4s (in 4.0.1) and about 1min (in 4.0.2). > > I will check in our timings logs to see if we see a general increase in > timings or if it's more only related to specific mails. > > Have a good one > Hi, one commit that can degrade performance is this commit https://github.com/apache/spamassassin/commit/4a6643c72fe5cd6296b2e67eb0ccc368a4987caa This tries to find CNAMEs for all hosts found in the email. From my tests this can slow down email processing a bit but not that much. Could you send me those emails in private ? Thanks Giovanni
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEqg3TnG6R3qYMxl94+r7qCYlyWOUFAmi39KYFAwAAAAAACgkQ+r7qCYlyWOVx wxAAnexw6TLgc89Xu9GS3h7n6Gd9DPvBEdqljDiS0B78RDnBYNYj65X6yqzGgBhyQaAa8XP80z3X pVYucKHYU7L4Y8LTV2hpXnXrejnp3/T33QzXJeHqH7hHuMWo0KpTyhC2RDLM0zwdgQE0Lqb4Xaj+ QHj4LFYvHytMWLHRwG+oYOAwTEs8+VzhdiMulbYJc/PgeXZh6bW8KtL6JXm1/uOA6Vng4wENObJd k6ky9GRy5OVVP9kLorLv3esJtTp/sq7MQYesl6EJ47bGkqpxojHB6FhY5301BBj4T/XwBuqaMo9m IeWhCjACKQEISzG3wqygCk4NLHcVN5EswI/WHQ99fMxMZuBzPNBijQEg9PxphpPdT/48mFa53S9e iiooyPnH/srEBk/rllKlOY4BbuICjZxZlnBEd92Zck66pHpRHCKVTXPXn9/FZ4fYnfuMfxVzuP5O G+Rgblk/bqJ96WdRv1mSSaWxsHdvd0DFr+rU0Gc7nJXYfdbgYe9FFUl3vSFSbEQd6YOngqOht7/3 xDg99NL/mMeLzXn4ddvMYrEPBB2N9QrVo1q9B0bskavC3N9McaFbN70NN6RYx2Li90qwe88xzVGm DJQCJvs8Gv93V631kX5o334ZjvsuyrNMu0i8v8nLO9cpJgbiQMGYIg7/Fam3cYknVhFMYo5ahKnT mSQ= =/VpD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----