Re: Bayes, possibly other network-dependent rules, intermittently not "working"
Bill Cole <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2025-10-16 at 09:48:23 UTC-0400 (Thu, 16 Oct 2025 09:48:23 -0400) Ricky Boone <[email protected]> is rumored to have said: > I'm banging my head over this, but not seeming to find anything that > stands out to me. > > Intermittently... rough estimate being around 1 in 5... I'm seeing > cases where an instance of SpamAssassin does not appear to use Bayes > against a message. I'm suspecting at the times that this is > happening, it's also having issues with network related > rules/functions, such as DNSBL checks. When I check a message > manually with `spamassassin -D`, Bayes seems to work properly, and in > some cases I get DNSBL responses that weren't present with the > original check. This sounds like what happens *BY DESIGN* when you have "shortcircuiting" configured. See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit' for details. -- Bill Cole [email protected] or [email protected] (AKA @[email protected] and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Not Currently Available For Hire