Re: What IP is used for the validity plugin?
Bill Cole <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:17:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-04-10 at 10:37:56 UTC-0400 (Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:37:56 +0200) Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> is rumored to have said: >> On 2026-04-10 03:25:48 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> I've now done >>> >>> systemctl enable --now spamassassin-maintenance.timer >>> >>> which should solve the issue in a few hours. > > On 10.04.26 13:24, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> I confirm: I now get the score 0.0 for each >> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_*_BLOCKED >> rule. >> >> However, I still get >> >> Apr 10 13:12:53 qaa spamd[142607]: check: dns_block_rule >> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED hit, creating >> /root/.spamassassin/dnsblock_sa-trusted.bondedsender.org (This means >> DNSBL blocked you due to too many queries. Set all affected rules >> score to 0, or use "dns_query_restriction deny >> sa-trusted.bondedsender.org" to disable queries) >> Apr 10 13:12:53 qaa spamd[142607]: check: dns_block_rule >> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED hit, creating >> /root/.spamassassin/dnsblock_sa-accredit.habeas.com (This means DNSBL >> blocked you due to too many queries. Set all affected rules score to >> 0, or use "dns_query_restriction deny sa-accredit.habeas.com" to >> disable queries) >> Apr 10 13:12:53 qaa spamd[142607]: check: dns_block_rule >> RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED hit, creating >> /root/.spamassassin/dnsblock_bl.score.senderscore.com (This means >> DNSBL blocked you due to too many queries. Set all affected rules >> score to 0, or use "dns_query_restriction deny >> bl.score.senderscore.com" to disable queries) >> >> in the logs. Shouldn't these queries be disabled by default in the >> future SpamAssassin versions? > > yes, they should, but seems thata they were forgotten Rather, not all references were chased, I think. John H. has some sub-rules (unscored) structured as meta-rules in his sandbox referencing VALIDITY rules, and even though these are set to "nopublish" they are in the svn tree and I suspect that they are forcing others back into inclusion in the rule distribution and without scores, they default to 1. I have committed r1932968, which explicitly forces the BLOCKED rules to absolute zero as well. -- Bill Cole [email protected] or [email protected] (AKA @[email protected] and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Please keep discussion mailing list replies *on-list* Not Currently Available For Hire