Re: spams using rb.gy redirector
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:59:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27.07.26 09:47, [email protected] wrote: >Isn't that what https://github.com/smfreegard/DecodeShortURLs >does? > >You'd just need to add the shortener to DecodeShortURLs.cf > >Or does this no longer work with newer versions of SA? I think it only supports plain redirectors, while rb.gy sends javascript code that does the redirect, just look at the output: curl --max-redirs 0 https://rb.gy/6x9cfg ...seems they did block short URL mentioned below. >On Sat, 25 Jul 2026, John Hardin wrote: > >>On Sat, 25 Jul 2026, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> >>>> Suggestion: >>>> > * 4.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to >>>100% >>>> * [score: 1.0000] >>>> * 0.5 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100% >>>> * [score: 1.0000] >>>> > ...boost your BAYES_999 score. A lot. >>> >>> I have kept scores somehow lower, so I can see what spam goes around. >>> So i can keep to report them etc. >> >>Quarantine rather than discard, then. I do that to feed rule >>development as well as my (tiny) masscheck corpus. >> >>> I repeat - every time I send a complaint to address found in ToS of >>> rebrand.ly where the "https://rb.gy/" points to, I get response that the >>> link hasn't been found. >> >>Sigh. >> >>FWIW, if you append ".stats" to the URL you get a status page that >>includes the redirection target. The url can be extracted and that >>page accessed directly. >> >>https://rb.gy/z3impw.stats >>redirects to https://app.rebrandly.com/public/links/share?href=rb.gy/z3impw >>(note the redirector URL as a query parameter) >> >>That page says the shortener redirects to >>https://trk.dirctpixelflow.com//click/sxs0j1ja >> >>So perhaps a plugin to retrieve the link page, extract the real >>link, and add that to the URIs list? >> >>The stats page is a bunch of javascript, though, so it might not be >>feasible absent some deeper analysis. >> >>> I am now thinking about explicitly banning these links, so the SMTP >>> message says that. >> >>That's probably the best approach. I will throw a subrule into the >>repo for that so that we can see what masscheck says (and you can >>use it in a scored rule). -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux IS user friendly, it's just selective who its friends are...