Re: Spamcop MX Records?
"Jeff G." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.email |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
WazoO <[email protected]> organized electrons in article news:[email protected] that appeared as follows: > "Paul Hutchings" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> Does anyone have an idea as to why Spamcop has two MX records with >> different values that both point to exactly the same IP addresses? > > You just did this to give Mike E. some ammunition, didn't > you? <g> First response, already answered "over there" > in the web-based Forum to your posted query there. As > said there, it's hard to believe that it's been over a year ... > > The catch is that this is also where JT made his explanation. > Search of the archives here should get you to where the data > was also brought "over here" .. but, the specific answer is at; > http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=3007 > "DNS Issues, An explanation of what's been going on" Mike Easter brought it over in a reply here entitled "[SpamCop-Mail] Re: {webmail,imap,mail}.spamcop.net not found?", dated "Tue, 9 Nov 2004 03:19:47 -0800", with "Message-ID: <[email protected]>", NNTP posted "Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:16:43 +0000 (UTC)", still available on news.spamcop.net, and archived "Tue Nov 9 03:15:41 EST 2004" (apparent 3 hours backward time travel notwithstanding) at http://news.spamcop.net/pipermail/spamcop-mail/2004-November/014634.html . -- Best Regards, Jeff G. I have been a SpamCop User/Member/Customer since 1999 and am a Moderator of the new web-based forums (now the primary method for getting help, http://forum.spamcop.net). Please reply via Forum, Group, or List only.