Re: Reporting My own IP?
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.email |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The Father Mind of DM Industries wrote: > Okay I fixed the dns resolve on both servers. Goodjob > But it still is not working. > See example. www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z741906119z23de0e976e15d09dc6f3cec824e26dd5z Yes. The parser is definitely b0rken and providing the wrong source. Thanks for converting to a tracker ;-) You are going to have to transition over to mailhosts to get proper parsing. The advantage of mailhosts is that after configuration the parser becomes familiar with your server's lines, and so the parser is 'spoon fed' the source answer. http://www.spamcop.net/mcgi?action=mhedit&authcode=X4vo9qbIhGGL1Dxx Mailhost configuration Altho' the mailhost logic was constructed to overcome problems with SC tripping during the parse because of not properly recognizing bogus lines, it also solves some other mysterious weaknesses. I can't figure out why SC is getting this wrong. I've messed with some forged lines on the other one I posted the tracker for to see if I could create something in the ballpark that it gets right, but I don't understand yet why it is blowing this. The verbose language shows the 'thinking' is correct right down to the moment/line that it names the wrong source. If you aren't yet configured to see the verbose of the logic, that is selected in the Preferences/ Report Handling Options/ Show Technical Details during reporting section/ check Show technical data "SpamCop can reveal the logic it uses as it finds the right reporting parties for your spam. This can be helpful for advanced users who want to double-check SpamCop's logic, or for new users who want to learn from SpamCop's example." -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin