Re: Re: New User
Paula McCallum <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.email |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jeff, Sorry to bother you again but I'm new at this and not much of a computer "geek" (no offense) I just don't understand how this information would pin point who sent this message. I've included the full header below to see if you can make any sense to it. I tried to go back online and post it like you suggested but I couldn't get back on with my username & password (ughh). Anyway, if there's anything you can do, I'd appreciate it. I belong to a motorcycle rider's group of about 170 people, I assume this guy/gal went to the meeting from waht they said in their e-mail which would narrow it down to about 40-50 people who were there that night (it could probably be narrowed down further to about 1/2 with computer access). There can't be that many computer literate folks in our group to have been that sophisticated to post an anonymous e-mail. He wrote to me because I write the group's newsl etter and to the guy in our club who receives all corospondence. I don't think I would have found anything on my first attempt if it hadn't been for the spamcop post with his IP # and this happening to someone else (Chad Ayers). Thanks, Paula >From MysteryDude MysteryDude Wed Jun 29 17:00:07 2005X-Apparently-To:[email protected] via 206.190.36.211; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:00:07 -0700X-Originating-IP:[66.163.178.61]Return-Path:<[email protected]>Authentication-Results:mta139.mail.re2.yahoo.com from=yahoo.com; domainkeys=pass (ok)Received:from 66.163.178.61 (HELO web33814.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.163.178.61) by mta139.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:00:07 -0700Received:(qmail 25412 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jun 2005 00:00:07 -0000DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JkgJes3A2ooJKeoVzHIj0aaGKIEHsuahVY0sLiwjJwFzwl4tXIsjtHoA3LM0LCc8/MWVVQiwR+RMqGZruEfEIK55luP0bFsyq6o/OyfnIFCUif7OZZesT4omuazI4t/9B0IYzfrXX4mlrRQCIL0ePHICrKxdi6UdnfCu6gBFW/k= ;Message-ID:<20050630000007.25410.qmail@w eb33814.mail.mud.yahoo.com>Received:from [4.154.243.2] by web33814.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:00:07 PDTDate:Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:00:07 -0700 (PDT)From: "MysteryDude MysteryDude" <[email protected]> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn moreTo:[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]:1.0Content-Type:multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1491621414-1120089607=:24089"Content-Transfer-Encoding:8bitContent-Length:685 [input] [input] [input] [input] Hello I'm writing this letter as a paid member of the Manomet Mystery Riders and also remaining unknown. Something from last months meeting is still bothering me. I want to know why Jack Cribbs can break the Bylaws. I also feel that every paid member should be aware of this. I want a signed statement by Jack Cribbs, the Officers of the group, and the Eboard members stating full responsibility of Sherri Palmer as a road captain in case a accident occurs. This should go to every paid member. No, I state No other club or group would had let this happen. Shame on you! "Jeff G." <[email protected]> wrote:This post is in response to the message from Bob that I quoted in my post "New User" to the spamcop.spam newsgroup, which unfortunately is not archived on the web but can be found by pointing your newsreader at news:[email protected] . Bob only included one set of full headers, so those will be my focus. It appears that abuse[at]dataforce.net and/or postmaster[at]dataforce.net is sending Bob's SpamCop Reports to the spammer. I suggest that Bob start munging his Reports to those two addresses, and that the Deputies rethink routing for the following: "routeid:10111567 195.42.181.0 - 195.42.181.127 to:abuse[at]dataforce.net Administrator found from whois records". The first upstream address is abuse[at]ruscomnet.ru (which "refuses SpamCop reports"), so I'd go with the second, abuse[at]mci.com. -- Thanks and Best Regards, Jeff G. I have been a SpamCop User/Member/Customer since 1999 and am a Moderator of the new web-based forums (now the primary method for getting help, http://forum.spamcop.net). Please contact me via Forum only, as Emails may be posted, reported, and/or ridiculed. _______________________________________________ SpamCop-Mail mailing list [email protected] http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-mail __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com