Re: Who is JT and why this NG won't be used?

"WazoO" <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:17:36 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.email
Organization SpamCop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Ilgaz Ocal" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
One thread starts at
http://news.spamcop.net/pipermail/spamcop-list/2004-January/071447.html

> I would not do anything on the forums administered by WazOo nicked
> person as he jumps to every single forum post, has a seriously flaming
> attitude etc.

Yeah, whatever ... I do make sure everything gets an answer.  As I'm
awake more hours than not, that also usually means that I'm the first
responder also.  Me actually flaming someone is pretty rare.  I'll also
assume you skipped over the numerous "thanks" received while focusing
on the "flaming" ...????

Section 8 - SpamCop's System & Active Staff
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?act=faq&article=13

> I hear on every single response of him that "JT" does not want us to
> use standard local nntp server way of describing our problems.

Just one of the threads in one SpamCop newsgroup pointed to
previously.  There are other threads in the other Archives also.
The Forum versus the newsgroups has come up often over the years.

> If that is the issue, I can not use forums if an issue happens. I
> simply REJECT any  "web forum" administered by some persons alter ego.
> If they are volunteer with such attitude, it is worse as they have
> nothing to lose and we "owe" them for some reason.

Just as in these newsgroups, the action is user-to-user support.
Yes, I'm filling the Admin slot, (there is a story behinf that) but ....
there are several other folks with Moderating powers, and there
are a number of others with relatively prolific postings.  Some
Topics I don't need to jump into as they were handled by other folks.

> I really like the Spamcop idea from early beginnings of it and as a way
> to show my support, I paid for yearly mail service.

Technically, you have been paying JT for his resources ... these
newsgroups, the Forum, and the SpamCop E-mail accounts are
all run on his hardware.  The use of a SpamCop account also has
the side benefit of a 'free' reporting account.

> If "JT" is more interested in diverting people from a standard based
> support NNTP server to some web board administered by non responsible
> (in financial, work terms) third parties ego, I am out.

As seen in the referenced ancient newsgroup threads, one would ask
where you've been.  As far as non-responsivle (in work terms) ...
once again .... over the last two years ..screw it, here's a copy
of a recently posted bit into another thread (as it turns out, in this
very newsgroup) ....
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-
As far as being paid ..... all work done as a "volunteer" ....

Admin / maintainer of the Forum
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/
Forum version of the SpamCop FAQ . much expanded
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=2238
SpamCop Glossary
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=4473
SpamCop Dictionary
http://forum.spamcop.net/dict/
SpamCop KnowledgeBase
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?act=faq
Portal Page for an introduction to everything SpamCop
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?act=home
and more stuff under development as we speak ....

the only "pay" received is the enjoyment of comments like this ...
Thanks for the kind words.

Please recollect that it was JT, owner of the systems that host
these newsgroups, the Forum, and some of the other tools
I've installed that made the call on SpamCop E-mail Account
support issues ....
=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-