Re: Who is JT and why this NG won't be used?

"Ilgaz Ocal" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2006-01-26 17:17:36 +0200, "WazoO" <[email protected]> said:
>
> No, I am paying for a service advertised at www.spamcop.net as a
> support to service (like donation) but I get something at return.
>
> Ask the person who is taking care of donations, you will figure I
> really support Spamcop only.

I have no idea what you are paying for or who you are sending
your money to.  You first state "e-mail for a year" but then bring
up "donations" .... if you follow the links, those options end up
going to different people, different companies, different U.S.
coasts .... That's your call.

> I tell JT should consider adding a SMTP server which has strict
> policies like "TLS only, port 583 secure login only" for "his" service.

The last time "SpamCop.net" offered any SMTP service was back
when Julian ran the whole thing on his own hardware, out of his own
pocket.  And even then, it wasn't a 'graceful' tool.  The lack of SMTP
remained when the newsgroups and e-mail services were moved
over to JT's systems.  Technically, JT's CES system/company does
offer full e-mail capabilties, but that is not the $30 / year SpamCop.net
thing.

> If spamcop does not get anything in return of the spamcop "hosted"
> individual mail, it should be openly said in the first page mentioning
> the service as well as it should warn that user has to find/use their
> own SMTP server.

The business arrangement is something done between Julian and JT ...
long before IronPort got involved.