Re: UMSY
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:13:47 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.email |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
CO-DBA-SC-EL wrote: > Why can't SpamCop email filter these annoying UMSY spams? See for > example report ID 1677920143. When you call up your own reportid, you can access everything about it via its tracker. When anyone else calls up your reportid, they can only see the subject Promo Movers: Weekly Member Newsletter Then, in order to know whatever it is you are trying to talk about, I have to go to sightings to find a spam and determine that it is a stockspam, and then I have to further derive that UMSY is a stock abbreviation by determining that US MedSys Corp is a known stockspam 'marketer'. So, then further, I have to search a little harder in sightings to find an actual UMSY stock promo in a promo movers newsletter. http://snipurl.com/n5gu Then, since you didn't provide a tracker to an example of the spam, I guess I'll make one myself http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z889921579z6324ae41d86ed5577815eb2cb0b372ffz That particular item was sourced from a CBL listed proxy 222.40.149.15 -- and it is entirely possible that yours was too. > I am bombarded with those, obviously sent through botnets. This has > been going on for over one week. The spammer has obviously found the > right formula to get around spamcop and spamAssassin. They don't even > bother to try to obfuscate "UMSY". >From your reportid, it appears that you are not spamcop reporting your spam, but instead you are mole reporting, which means that your spam isn't contributing to the SCbl. If you want to discuss why a particular spam wasn't blocked, you should be looking at its headers and you should be thinking about what blocklists you have enabled, and you should be thinking about how you have your SpamAssassin SA score set, because the item which I provided a tracker for was caught be a SA type filter, and that item would have also been caught by my filter on the basis of its CBL listing. So, if your choice of configuration for spamcop's filter isn't doing the job, maybe you should consider fixing your configuration. So, my gripes about this communication so far are: - if you are going to talk about a spam which wasn't filtered, you should post a tracker for it, not a reportid - if you are going to talk about /anything/ don't abbreviate more than what someone who isn't looking at the same thing you are looking at will be able to figure out. This isn't a guessing game, altho' sometimes we play it - if you are 'just' a mole reporter, your reports don't really count, so you aren't helping the SCbl and therefore your reports aren't helping other people filter their spam -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin