Re: UMSY

"Mike Easter" <[email protected]> wrote in news:e0jff3$4hc$1
@news.spamcop.net:

> D. T. wrote:
> 
>> I think the CBL blocking might be broken at the moment for those of
>> use with SC email accounts. A few days ago, I too started seeing a
>> flood of obvious stock pumps that my SC settings were no longer
>> catching. Here are two tracking URLs:
>>
> www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z893629776zd3d88b5dc4ce361f2ddffd2c9ddbfb0cz
> 
> That tracker doesn't show me evidence of passing thru' SC's mail
> filter -- there are no SC Xlines in the header.  Yes, the source is
> currently CBL listed.

Oops....I have this paranoid habit of stripping all the SC stuff, as well 
as the Barracuda firewall stuff, out of messages before I parse/report 
them. When actually sending spam reports, that's too much information 
possibly delivered into the hands of spam-friendly hosts, IMO.

But when I post a Tracking URL here, I'll be sure to leave all the SC stuff 
in the headers before parsing.

DT