Re: M$ kills Christmas 2006
"Mr K. Mean" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.geeks |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris F. Willoughby wrote: > "Borgholio" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>> >> Combined with how much "Big Brother" bullshit is in Vista...do you smell >> something burning? > > > http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1931913,00.asp > > Read that before berating Microsoft. So, now that I have read it, can I berate them? I mean marketing-wise, it sound fine, although a lot of items that were being promised a year or two ago seem to have disappeared from the features list as the timeline for the release keeps stretching out into the future. So more secure? Well, that recent nasty security hole, the wrong sized mp3 and wmv one, apparently also required patching in the Vista beta versions, so it doesn't seem like everything has been made more secure. Like the article said, they can't change a lot of stuff without hopelessly breaking backwards compatibility. I noticed it said non administrative accounts will be the default. Of course, I assume that it will continue to be pointless to run that way since things will continue to mysteriously and silently fail and the only way to resolve that is to just give yourself more privileges. Why can't Windows ever get a handle on making a system that is truly able to handle multi users with varying levels of security. When I can telnet into frozen Windows box and kill off a few runaway processes, then it seems like Windows will finally get it. I've heard conflicting things about how good it will be to move some of the code in or out of the security rings. I think I saw a debate on where video drivers should live and whether moving those items, written by third parties, will make the system more or less stable. I guess it all remains to be seen then. And the rest of the changes are the standard wizzy marketing spiel. Flashy 3D interfaces, built in applications to replace all those that most people have already found third party, media player improvements (yeah, with tighter restrictions on what media you can play), and a few other things that made me yawn. Most of that is crap that I will have to figure out how disable because I detest things that flash and are distracting and mostly just waste memory and cpu cycles. What I would like to see, but will likely not see, is it is completely inexcusable that a computer with 1 gig of memory and and whatever super fast CPU would ever freeze, but I expect that I will continue to sit and wait for 30 seconds, a few minutes while some virus checker freezes my desktop while it madly scans for threats.