Re: Need disk error checker for Windows XP

POP wrote:
> "Borgholio" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]...

>>
>>I'm sorry but I have to disagree with you both.  I have found 
>>from personal experience that you can take a damaged drive, 
>>freshly re-format it, run chkdsk, and not find anything.  Fill 
>>it with data, run chkdsk, and it will locate bad sectors that 
>>never existed before.
> 
> 
> Umm, I think I see where you're going with this, and although 
> it's a good point for newbies to realize, you seem to be fishing 
> for an arguement here, not asking for any actual input.  I'm 
> pretty sure you know better from past posts you've made.  Sorry, 
> I've no more to say to you on the subject.
> 
> Pop
> 
> 

I'm not trying to argue, I'm asking for input on which disk scanner is 
best.  You say it's Chkdsk, and I'm simply explaining why I disagree. 
If Chkdsk really did what you claim it does, I wouldn't be here asking 
for an alternative.