Re: One more time, please...

J G <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help
Organization SpamCop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/15/2005 8:05 PM Mike Easter scribbled:

> J G wrote:
> 
> 
>>At 7-9 A.M.Pacific time, I'm getting 2 minute
>>waits per parse,
> 
> 
> That's a bad time.  If I were being delayed a lot, I wouldn't do it
> then.
> 
> 
>>>The disadvantage is that you have to wait for the mailforwarded
>>>items to get processed in their own sweet time.  The other
>>>disadvantage is that you still have to manage the problem of
>>>accessing the numerous link/s and and the report approval process
>>>however efficient or inefficient that is.
>>
>>Heres where I got lost - does forwarding a spam, going to work and
>>coming back on  cause the "unsubmitted report notice" to pop up next
>>sign on?
> 
> 
> If you forward spams, you come back to links which require time.

That must be the line over the input box which says you have unreported
spam - see below

> 
> 
>>This isn't explained anywhere I can find.  Due to the system
>>dragging, I've chalked this up to a failed send in the prior session,
>>which has occured 3 or 4 times this week.
>>And the forwarding solution /doesn't/ report spamvertisers - hmmm...
> 
> 
> The forwarding can be done as a regular report which does report
> spamvertisers if they are resolved;  or it can be done as quick which
> doesn't.  If you have requested and been approved for quick.


requested and approved for "quick"?  How so?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.