Re: One more time, please...
J G <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/15/2005 8:05 PM Mike Easter scribbled: > J G wrote: > > >>At 7-9 A.M.Pacific time, I'm getting 2 minute >>waits per parse, > > > That's a bad time. If I were being delayed a lot, I wouldn't do it > then. > > >>>The disadvantage is that you have to wait for the mailforwarded >>>items to get processed in their own sweet time. The other >>>disadvantage is that you still have to manage the problem of >>>accessing the numerous link/s and and the report approval process >>>however efficient or inefficient that is. >> >>Heres where I got lost - does forwarding a spam, going to work and >>coming back on cause the "unsubmitted report notice" to pop up next >>sign on? > > > If you forward spams, you come back to links which require time. That must be the line over the input box which says you have unreported spam - see below > > >>This isn't explained anywhere I can find. Due to the system >>dragging, I've chalked this up to a failed send in the prior session, >>which has occured 3 or 4 times this week. >>And the forwarding solution /doesn't/ report spamvertisers - hmmm... > > > The forwarding can be done as a regular report which does report > spamvertisers if they are resolved; or it can be done as quick which > doesn't. If you have requested and been approved for quick. requested and approved for "quick"? How so?