Re: Why Doesn't Spamcop Lart Yahoo?

On 6/17/2005 12:36 PM SJones scribbled:

> On or about 6/17/2005 2:18 PM, McWebber penned the following:
> 
>>Headers:
>>
>>Return-Path: <[email protected]>
>>Received: from web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com
>>[68.142.199.247])
>> by redacted (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j5HHibA12200
>> for <spamtrap>; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:44:37 -0500
>>Received: (qmail 21250 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Jun 2005 17:45:18 -0000
>>DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
>>  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
>>
>>h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content
>>-Transfer-Encoding;
>>
>>b=FaLGac5qEgSH983qwmZC277P+nlgogd1GkelnEpOGck1TUl/yRbqfF4f4HxOUjp7OU12R3C0Kx
>>kW5wJ9oVy08HXohqNSf7vU6I9Bfa5zA19J89XlS1FkQ0Ca59cL5So5J36ilkHNF725Ym0ZKfeKDd
>>9MJ/59yPqqUmKpmJCZE8Q=  ;
>>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>Received: from [68.80.203.195] by web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri,
>>17 Jun 2005 10:45:18 PDT
>>Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
>>From: gene simone <[email protected]>
>>Subject: RE: Response to your recent Refinance request
>>To: spamtrap
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>boundary="0-1804541703-1119030318=:20259"
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>X-UIDL: a)j"!*X+"!G=Y"!mHW"!
>>
>>Spamcop only wants to send to [email protected] instead of both Comcast and
>>Yahoo where the email is coming from. Also, in this case, the identical spam
>>was previously received from a similar address signed by the same person.
>>
>>Return-Path: <[email protected]>
>>Received: from web53509.mail.yahoo.com (web53509.mail.yahoo.com
>>[206.190.37.70])
>> by redacted (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j36KA8Y12144
>> for <spamtrap>; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:10:09 -0500
>>Received: (qmail 1625 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2005 20:11:46 -0000
>>Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
>>DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
>>  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
>>
>>b=FEqXL493vJ+okYYYMl1dUphGMRXu+Psd0v88YMdNH/sQG/MCEbRdr8kGTxm3eFK6JOa0f7mLOb
>>TvR/E2aFN3pCY7w29QfGEKmJJt4GGc8c+Q4M70MrxyBF3gAUYy4EL48pvwxiqbj+TJcPFvLMqwbw
>>qBbETkVp9c8ig2YM3Cldo=  ;
>>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>Received: from [68.80.203.195] by web53509.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06
>>Apr 2005 13:11:46 PDT
>>Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
>>From: gene s <[email protected]>
>>Subject: RE: Response to your recent Refinance request
>>To: spamtrap
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>boundary="0-616926842-1112818306=:99681"
>>X-UIDL: $iP!!(kl!!o,W!!ha`!!
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Since the return address DOES show as a good address, I would assume
> that Yahoo doesn't accept spamcop reports.
> 
> 250 sender <[email protected]> ok
> RCPT TO:<[email protected]>
> 250 recipient <[email protected]> ok
> RSET
> 250 reset ok
> QUIT
> 221 mta134.mail.re2.yahoo.com
> 
Yahoo only accepts reports on bad addresses?
Could that be explained?