Re: Spammer tricks successfully beat spamcop
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mike Easter wrote: > Phil Scadden wrote: >> Link isnt parsed and doesnt find the spam source > Report Spam to: > Re: 131.203.5.60 > which appears to be your mailhost, because it breaks the chain > prematurely. > > Abbreviated Receive lines *comment > from grfn6.gns.cri.nz ([131.203.5.60]) by dndm1.gns.cri.nz *serves > you from omega.gns.cri.nz (unverified) by grfn6.gns.cri.nz *serves > you from (host86-130-77-159.range86-130.btcentralplus.com > [86.130.77.159]) by omega.gns.cri.nz *sourceline > > SC fails to make the chain from the 2nd line to the third, leaving it > stuck with the 1st. One of the main reasons that SC can't chain thru' those lines is the great discrepancy between the IPs of the mx which gets the spam and the server which puts it in your mailbox. If the grfn6 server had stamped its line in the 'from' field with the IP of the server it got it from, you would have had a more satisfactory outcome. For demonstration purposes only, I have forged a spam in which I have corrected the deficiency of grfn6's line stamping http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z779834567z8407ed771ddb9549ad3eda29942f0397z <now cancelled> That tracker shows SC correctly naming the source: Report Spam to: Re: 161.65.52.34 (Automated open-relay testing system(s)) To: Internal spamcop handling: (relays) (Notes) Re: 86.130.77.159 (Administrator of network where email originates) To: [email protected] (Notes) To: Internal spamcop handling: (bt) ... and it suspects the MX of being an 'open relay' because it is unfamiliar with it. The configuration which I changed/forged the original to looks like this: Abbreviated Receive lines *comment from grfn6.gns.cri.nz ([131.203.5.60]) by dndm1.gns.cri.nz *serves you from omega.gns.cri.nz (161.65.52.34) by grfn6.gns.cri.nz *serves you from (host86-130-77-159.range86-130.btcentralplus.com [86.130.77.159]) by omega.gns.cri.nz *sourceline The difference from the original is that the 'from' field of the 2nd line is correctly configured to show the IP of the source [its own server] from which it got the item. Proper compliance requires that the Received tracelines be properly configured, and grfn6 isn't stamping its line, the 2nd one properly. In this case, that makes a lot of difference to spamcop, because there's a lot of difference in the IPs between omega and grfn6. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin