Re: I know you're tired of hearing this, but ... re FAQs
"Pop" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > WazoO wrote: >> In the case of the SpamCop forum, >> I'm doing what I can to take advantage of doing >> something >> to make it a viable resource for those that use it. > > Yet another function of the forum - don't you really > need another ;-) > could be to direct or encourage people to use the > newsgroups. > > The forum's structure lends itself to such as > stickies to make the faq > more dynamic or timely; but it shouldn't be a > replacement for a > properly navigable frequently updated website faq. > > The forum is also somehow appealing as a dialog place > both to those > people who don't know how to use a newsreader, and > also to some others > for some strange reasons which probably have to do > with their personal > ideas about moderation of a forum as opposed to an > unwillingness to > moderate a newsgroup, or maybe because of some kind > of little html > features. > > But I also think the forum could be a stepping stone > to the more > efficient dynamics of a 'real' newsgroup > interaction -- much as is seen > in the evolving googlegroupers. They 'discover' news > in googlegroups. > Then they learn that they can interact more > 'smoothly' with a newsreader > than browser working googlegroups. Similarly those > who discover > 24hoursupport.helpdesk in the iamnotageek forum > gravitate to the nntp > newsgroup. > > So, one can still use googlegroups for certain > functions, like searching > and linking to a past discussion, but for 'everyday' > communication, one > uses their nntp newsreader, not a browser. > > > -- > Mike Easter > kibitzer, not SC admin > > IMO that's an importan and excelllletnt observataion.