Re: I know you're tired of hearing this, but ... re FAQs

"Pop" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help
Organization SpamCop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> WazoO wrote:
>> In the case of the SpamCop forum,
>> I'm doing what I can to take advantage of doing 
>> something
>> to make it a viable resource for those that use it.
>
> Yet another function of the forum - don't you really 
> need another ;-)
> could be to direct or encourage people to use the 
> newsgroups.
>
> The forum's structure lends itself to such as 
> stickies to make the faq
> more dynamic or timely;  but it shouldn't be a 
> replacement for a
> properly navigable frequently updated website faq.
>
> The forum is also somehow appealing as a dialog place 
> both to those
> people who don't know how to use a newsreader, and 
> also to some others
> for some strange reasons which probably have to do 
> with their personal
> ideas about moderation of a forum as opposed to an 
> unwillingness to
> moderate a newsgroup, or maybe because of some kind 
> of little html
> features.
>
> But I also think the forum could be a stepping stone 
> to the more
> efficient dynamics of a 'real' newsgroup 
> interaction -- much as is seen
> in the evolving googlegroupers.  They 'discover' news 
> in googlegroups.
> Then they learn that they can interact more 
> 'smoothly' with a newsreader
> than browser working googlegroups.  Similarly those 
> who discover
> 24hoursupport.helpdesk in the iamnotageek forum 
> gravitate to the nntp
> newsgroup.
>
> So, one can still use googlegroups for certain 
> functions, like searching
> and linking to a past discussion, but for 'everyday' 
> communication, one
> uses their nntp newsreader, not a browser.
>
>
> -- 
> Mike Easter
> kibitzer, not SC admin
>
>
IMO that's an importan and excelllletnt observataion.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.