Re: X-No-Archive: yes and the newsgroup archives

On 2005-07-06 23:24:41 +0300, "WazoO" <[email protected]> said:

> Just noting that there is a lot of data being lost due to
> usage of this header flag bit.  Some threads leave one
> wondering what was actually being talked to as there
> are Reply's listed with no corresponding previous
> entry.

I used that header for couple of days until figuring many of people I 
try to help does not have actual usenet access (from ISP etc)

I removed the header, but still it doesn't mean I like Google ; the 
search engine default I take time to change to yahoo to archive my 
messages.

Well, looks as I better be patient about google for a couple of months.

I never understand why they changed the excellent, mature dejanews code 
to something they use. "Look we code better!'? Well, it clearly failed. 
" IMHO ".

I remember having IBM.net account with their excellent usenet service. 
Some days I was lazy to launch nntp reader I have and was using 
dejanews account to post replies etc. It was that good (I bet you know)

If you people try to help people etc, you can either mail them or keep 
that header away.

Ilgaz
ps: I don't get how a T1 speed running professional mail harvester 
would get tricked by "NOSPAM" etc but its not the topic now :)