Re: No source IP address found, cannot proceed.
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Anon_ wrote: > "WazoO" >> "Anon_" >>> Why did it parse correctly for me (now) and failed for the OP? >> >> Check poster's other thread in the spamcop newsgroup. ... which thread sez: <snip> BMW wrote: > Ellen wrote: >> "BMW" >>> Still doesn't answer my question so here is yet another (in proper format): www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z800666612z042f3048b472e29617f368eb722ae809z >>> It is real it has a source IP and SC doesn't believe it. What good >>> is this service if it doesn't work? >> The parse looks fine to me and you mailhosts look OK. Are you seeing >> something different? >> Did Don make some changes for you in the mailhosts? > Yes, I made the changes. . . Mailhost setting for "theplanet" have > changed, much to my surprise. Things seem to be working. Thanks for > your help! </snip> Anon_ wrote: > I had checked and did again check and NONE mentioned that anyone had > reparsed the link successfully - with the option of sending a report > to specific abuse desks! You are saying 'anyone had reparsed the /link/ successfully'. That is ambiguous. A link might be the tracking url, or a link might be a spamvertised url in a particular spam. BMW is saying things are working, ie saying that the parser is parsing the spam. That [where 'that' is parsing a spamvertised link inside a spam] isn't what the conversation/thread was about. The conversation was about what this thread was about, which is parsing a spam, not determining a notify for a spamvertised link. The OP was posting about the parser failing to parse a spam <snip> BMW wrote: > What is up with SC? I haven't been able to submit a SPAM that "got > through" for a long time. I always get > > "No source IP address found, cannot proceed." > > Sample = > http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z800666612z042f3048b472e29617f368eb722ae809z > > I'd appreciate any help you could offer. . . </snip> I think you Anon might be getting mixed up about what we are talking about. We are not talking about the parser failing to notify for a spamvertised link. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin