Re: spamcop missing a link, sorta.

Mike Easter did pass the time by typing:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>> Feed SC the naked url with and without the #obfuscation:
>
>> The business about the variable DNS from 222.187.122.174 to
>> 221.11.133.63 isn't exactly SC fault, however.  But I'm not exactly
>> sure whether the parser is trying to get a DNS on the url with or
>> without the # obfuscation.  It isn't clear from the verbose.
>
> The DNS is variable, but SC seems to be able to give addresses when it
> isn't # obfuscated.

Thanks, I tried that with the last few spams and they parsed correctly.
Odd.  I don't like modifying the spam, but if that is what it takes
till SC parses out the html target codes.... :/

Odd though, the # is used to tell the browser where to jump in the html
page.  It's not actually obfuscation unless the spammer
wants to try example.com#joe.net in which case joe.net is the phony.

This is how I use them on my pathetic excuse for a site.
http://revbeergoggles.com/Fixes/diagnostics.html#sensors


-- 
DougW