Re: blank spam

one thing I did notice is that spancop can't handle these blank spams 
either without a subject and body...






N. Miller wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:19:38 -0800, N. Miller wrote:
> 
> 
>>When you see the Comcast header lines about non-compliance with RFC 821,
>>and adding a date, that is just the MTA telling you how it handled a
>>particular problem it found with an incoming email.
> 
> 
> Silly me; I could have just grabbed the headers from the BBR forum and run
> them through the parser. I also noticed that the Maillenium server
> references RFC 822, not RFC 821.
> 
> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z822482916z77a62209411fcb1adc4f17c3574b515bz
>