Re: blank spam

to continue to post off topic....   this is not going to really help my 
issue but ....

the top post is the most important. a first person reply should be at 
the top. the previous post or "quote does not need to be necessarily in 
the reply since it "follows" a previous post. reposting everything since 
the original post is a waste of newsgroup space. I seem to be perfectly 
ok wether there is top posts or bottom posts, but thats just me. No OE 
here.... I use Netscape

needing previous posts at the top of every post is for lazy 
unintelligent unconservative #@$#$#%#$.


Now back to are regularly scheduled topic....







Mike Easter wrote:
> die spammer wrote:
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
> Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
> 
> 
>>download.com does have a mailenium program available for download
> 
> 
> 
> die spammer wrote:
> 
>>one thing I did notice is that spancop can't handle these blank spams
>>either without a subject and body...
> 
> 
> 
> Here's an article discussing the preferred style of attributions and
> quoting in newsgroups  http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/nquote.html
> Quoting Style in Newsgroup Postings
> 
> Here's an article discussing topposting & TOFU
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topposting  Top-posting means replying to a
> message above the original message.
> 
> Here's an article describing what happened to cause some OE users to
> have trouble fighting corporate email TOFU configurations with newsgroup
> posts  http://www.insideoe.com/faqs/why.htm#signature  Why can't OE
> insert my signature after quoted text in replies?
> 
> 
> I don't know if there is a similar article explaining what causes a
> non-OE user to toppost instead of trimming and contextualizing..
> 
> 
>